Skip to content

Cost-benefit analysis

Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a structured method for comparing the total expected costs of a project against its expected benefits to determine whether it is worth doing and which option delivers the best value. In EV charging and electrification projects, CBA helps decision-makers evaluate different charger configurations, site designs, and operating models based on financial returns, operational impact, and wider benefits such as CO₂ savings.

What Is Cost-Benefit Analysis?

Cost-benefit analysis quantifies and compares:
– Costs: CAPEX, OPEX, financing, maintenance, grid connection, construction, internal labor
– Benefits: revenue, cost savings, productivity gains, risk reduction, compliance value, sustainability value
A CBA typically converts benefits into monetary terms where possible and evaluates results across time using metrics like net present value (NPV) and payback period.

Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Matters for EV Charging

EV charging investments have multiple cost drivers and uncertain utilization early on. CBA matters because it:
– Prevents overbuilding (too much power or too many chargers too early)
– Compares alternatives objectively (AC vs DC, phased rollout vs full build)
– Captures grid connection and civil works costs that often dominate budgets
– Improves procurement decisions and tender justification
– Aligns infrastructure design with real operational demand and timelines
For fleets and real estate, CBA also supports internal approvals by linking charging to measurable business outcomes.

What Costs Are Included in EV Charging CBA

A robust EV charging CBA usually includes:

Capital Costs (CAPEX)

– Chargers and mounting hardware
– Civil works (trenching, reinstatement, concrete foundations, conduit installation)
– Electrical works (panels, circuit breakers, cables, metering)
– Grid connection costs and upgrades (connection offer, connection fees)
– Networking equipment, payment terminals, signage, bay markings
– Engineering, design, project management, and permitting

Operating Costs (OPEX)

– Electricity costs (€/kWh) and tariff structure impacts
– Connection and capacity-related charges (connection tariffs)
– Maintenance and service agreements (preventive + corrective)
– Connectivity subscriptions (SIMs), backend CPMS fees
– Payment processing fees for contactless and transaction costs
– Warranty handling, parts replacement, and site visits
– Insurance, vandalism repairs, and site management costs

Lifecycle and Risk Costs

– Component replacements (connectors, contactors, fans)
– Downtime risk and lost revenue from reduced uptime
– Future expansion costs if the initial build is not future-proofed
– End-of-life removal or refurbishment (where relevant)

What Benefits Are Included in EV Charging CBA

Benefits depend on the business model and use case:

Direct Revenue (Public or Paid Workplace Charging)

– Energy-based revenue (€/kWh)
– Time-based fees, idle fees, session fees
– Subscription income (charging subscription plans)
– Roaming settlement revenue (where applicable)
– Ancillary revenue (parking fees, retail uplift, advertising in some models)

Cost Savings (Fleets and Internal Charging)

– Reduced fuel cost versus ICE vehicles
– Reduced maintenance costs
– Reduced reimbursement overhead via centralized billing (corporate fleet invoicing)
– Avoided public charging markups through depot charging

Operational Benefits

– Higher vehicle readiness and fewer route disruptions (fleet context)
– Employee retention and site attractiveness (CRE/workplace context)
– Reduced travel friction and time savings through on-site charging

Strategic and Compliance Benefits

– Improved tender competitiveness and customer requirements alignment
– Meeting climate targets and corporate decarbonization commitments
– Eligibility for grants or public support (where applicable)
– Improved reporting and transparency for ESG stakeholders (CO₂ reporting)

Typical Outputs and Metrics

CBA outputs commonly include:
– Net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR)
– Payback period and breakeven utilization assumptions
– Sensitivity analysis (utilization rate, electricity price, connection cost, uptime)
– Scenario comparison (phased vs full rollout, AC-heavy vs DC-heavy mix)
– Risk-adjusted ROI and operational constraints summary

Best Practices for EV Charging CBA

– Model utilization realistically with ramp-up curves, not immediate steady-state assumptions
– Separate peak power from delivered energy (power curves, charging tapering)
– Include connection lead times as a schedule risk with cost implications
– Use conservative uptime and maintenance assumptions early on
– Include expansion optionality: ducts, panel capacity, and load balancing strategies
– Validate assumptions against real charging session analytics when available

Common Pitfalls

– Ignoring civil works and grid upgrade costs, underestimating CAPEX
– Assuming charger nameplate kW equals delivered kW and revenue
– Overestimating utilization without location-specific demand evidence
– Excluding ongoing network/capacity charges and payment processing fees
– Not accounting for downtime risk and service response constraints
– Comparing options without consistent assumptions and time horizons

Charging ROI
Charging Station Profitability
Connection Offer
Connection Tariffs
Load Balancing
Charging Utilization Rate
Charging Session Analytics
Corporate Decarbonization
CO₂ Savings